Are Cycle Helmets a Legal Requirement

Below is a quick guide to help you and your family drive safely (and legally). Dr. John Black is a senior emergency physician who has led helicopter acute care teams and advised the government on emergency care. He saw the terrible consequences that can result from a head injury on a bike, something that evidence shows can get worse if the cyclist doesn`t wear a helmet. Black believes helmets should be required by law. He was one of a number of doctors who wrote to the British Medical Association asking it to formally require mandatory helmet use. As a result, he did, a decision that remains controversial. Unfortunately, helmet laws for older children (especially teenagers) might actually discourage bicycle use. According to a study by the National Bureau of Economic Research: It is perfectly legal for cyclists to ride side by side on the road. However, the Highway Traffic Act states that you cannot drive more than two side by side, and you cannot do so if you are driving in curves on narrow roads or by bike. City-wide bike-sharing systems have become increasingly common in recent years, spreading to hundreds of locations around the world.

Almost without exception, these have proven to be very popular. But not in Australia. If you ride a shared bike in London or New York, Paris or Hangzhou, you can bring a helmet if you wish, or simply jump and pedal. Do the latter in Melbourne or Brisbane and you risk being arrested and fined by the police, as mandatory helmet laws have been in place since the early 1990s. Both programs have tried to get around this problem by placing free helmets on bikes – Melbourne leaves 1,000 new ones a month – or by selling cheap helmets in nearby shops. 1 – Is it legal to cycle on the sidewalk in the UK? We can also ask ourselves whether legislative intervention is effective in achieving the objective of protecting cyclists without compromising cycling habits. In principle, this should be the case, as it can be cheaper than running a health promotion program that aims to increase the voluntary use of helmets. There is a pragmatic question that is incalculable at this point: the law requires the application of the law, and the question arises as to what should be the appropriate enforcement strategy. However, the threat of sanctions has an important symbolic value. It is important that the law be applied fairly and that it be phased in over time to ensure that individuals have a fair chance to comply. All of this makes perfect sense, doesn`t it? However, let`s listen to another doctor.

Dr. Harry Rutter is a public health expert specializing in physical activity. He is skeptical about the overemphasis on helmets as a safety measure. “Most of the risks of serious injuries while cycling are not intrinsic to the activity `motorists impose it on cyclists`,” he argued in the influential Handbook City Cycling. Cycling is a benign activity that often takes place in dangerous environments. Of the three main elements that determine serious bicycle injuries – road design and conditions, the motorist and the cyclist – the cyclist is the most studied.â Bicycle helmets reduce the risk of serious head injuries due to violent impacts, but more than half of Americans who ride bicycles, skateboard or scooter do not wear them. If you are an experienced cyclist, you will know that there are many cyclists who choose not to wear a helmet. It`s one of those age-old debates that probably won`t end anytime soon – if at all – as long as the bikes are on the road. In fact, we`ve done some research on whether or not you should wear a bike helmet and the possible trade-offs. BSEN 1078 was first published in 1997 and adopted as a European standard in 2012. Prior to BSEN 1078, many bicycle helmets were manufactured to the Snell B95 standard, which is stricter and offers protection against higher impact speeds.

It can be said that BSEN 1078 was a step backwards for safety. The island government commissioned the UK`s reputable and independent transport research laboratory to evaluate the plan. The report found that in the year before the ban, 84% of children in Jersey wore helmets anyway and not a single one under the age of 14 had been seriously injured while cycling. Washington: There is no national law. Orting requires cyclists under the age of 17 to wear a helmet on a bicycle. Poulsbo requires cyclists under the age of 18 to wear a helmet on a bicycle. Seatac requires cyclists of all ages over 1 year of age to wear a helmet when sitting on a bike. (Note: There is an important difference between this law and most others. The SeaTac Act does not apply to infants under 1 year of age and allows parents to legally ride with infants who are not old enough to wear a helmet. Learn more about riding with babies in this blog post). The following locations require cyclists of all ages to wear a helmet when seated on a bike: Aberdeen, Auburn, Bainbridge Island, Bellevue, Bremerton, Des Moines, DuPont, Duvall, Eatonville, Enumclaw, Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Hunts Point, Kent, King County, Lakewood, Milton, Pierce County, Port Angeles, Port Orchard, Puyallup, Renton, Seattle, Snoqualmie, Spokane, Steilacoom, Tacoma, University Place and Vancouver.

However, I believe these reductions could be mitigated by cultural changes (where helmet use is the “norm”) and by providing free or subsidized helmets to children in need. The question of whether cyclists should wear a helmet often provokes the anger of those who are on four wheels. But what`s the biggest benefit: increased physical safety or creating a better environment for people to ride a bike without a helmet? As Boardman noted, helmets and high visibility are almost unknown in the Netherlands, perhaps the least dangerous country in the world for cyclists. You don`t make cycling safe by forcing every cyclist to dress up as an urban war. To do this, you create a road system that isolates them from fast and unpredictable road traffic. (Please note that I am not a lawyer and have no legal training. This is my best understanding of the laws as they exist today). I don`t know what the laws are about this, but we should have national laws in every state that everything, whether it`s a scooter, a bike, a BMX bike, skateboarding, skates and more, should be mandatory to wear a helmet. This includes other things like mountain bikes and go-karts. It has been proven that these helmets can and often do the difference between relatively intact livelihoods and severe brain damage or death.